Something I was taught from early childhood—we’ll call it The Basics—became the foundation of how I viewed the world, my community, my family, and myself. Every belief I had about how life is and should be was built on that lesson I learned from toddlerhood.
There was ego in it, too. The idea that we didn’t do that, and because we didn’t, we were morally and ethically superior to those who did. So yes, this lesson became the foundation of my ethics.
It wasn’t until I was already over 50 years old that I learned the person who taught me this lesson—the one at the core of my belief system—had not only failed to follow it, but had violated it.
Rite of Reckoning — a Southern Gothic novel of secrets, grief, and hard-won healing. Get it direct from the author →
The revelation rocked me. It turned my world upside down for a while.
But eventually, something settled into place.
Even though the teacher was flawed, the lesson itself was still a good one. It was still a tenet of how I wanted to live.
My belief system wasn’t wrong. But it wasn’t what I thought it was, either.
We don’t just inherit beliefs. We inherit the authority behind them.
As children, we don’t separate the lesson from the person teaching it. The two arrive together, fused into something that feels unquestionable. If the source is trusted, the belief carries that same weight. It becomes part of how we define right and wrong, safe and unsafe, acceptable and not.
And then we build on it.
Over time, that early lesson grows roots. It connects to other ideas. It shapes decisions, reactions, judgments. It becomes part of the structure underneath everything else.
Which is why it can be so disorienting when the source cracks.
When you find out the person who taught you something foundational didn’t live by it, the first instinct is often to question the entire structure. If they didn’t follow it, was it ever real? Was it ever valid?
That moment can feel like the floor dropping out from under you.
Because it’s not just about the belief. It’s about trust. About identity. About the quiet assumption that the things you built your life on were solid.
But here’s where it gets more nuanced.
A flawed source doesn’t automatically invalidate the lesson. It complicates it. It forces you to look at it directly, without the buffer of who taught it to you.
And that’s where a different kind of clarity shows up.
You get to ask: Do I still believe this?
Not because someone told you to. Not because it’s part of your identity. But because, when you look at it on its own, it still holds up.
Sometimes the answer is no.
Sometimes you realize the belief only existed because of where it came from, and without that, it doesn’t stand.
But sometimes—and this is the part we don’t talk about as often—the belief survives.
It becomes yours in a way it wasn’t before.
Stripped of its origin, it’s no longer something you inherited. It’s something you’ve examined and chosen.
That doesn’t erase the shock of the original revelation. It doesn’t make the contradiction any less real.
What it does is separate two things that were never meant to be the same: the value of a principle and the behavior of the person who taught it.
People fail their own standards all the time. They teach things they aspire to, not things they consistently live. They pass along ideals they couldn’t fully embody.
That doesn’t make the ideal meaningless. It makes it human.
The real shift happens when you stop asking whether the source was perfect and start asking whether the belief still belongs in your life.
Because once you do that, the belief is no longer something you’re carrying forward out of habit or loyalty.
It’s something you’ve kept—intentionally.
And that’s a very different foundation to stand on.
Book 3 of the Rites of Passage Trilogy — where old wounds finally meet their reckoning.
Visit the Book Page →